UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS APPLIED TO SUPERVISED CONTROL OF APHIDS AND BROWN RUST IN WINTER-WHEAT .2. RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF DIFFERENT COMPONENTSOF UNCERTAINTY
Wah. Rossing et al., UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS APPLIED TO SUPERVISED CONTROL OF APHIDS AND BROWN RUST IN WINTER-WHEAT .2. RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF DIFFERENT COMPONENTSOF UNCERTAINTY, Agricultural systems, 44(4), 1994, pp. 449-460
The components of an existing model for supervised control of aphids (
especially Sitobion avenae) and brown rust (Puccinia recondita) in win
ter wheat contain uncertainty. Their contribution to uncertainty about
model output is assessed. The model simulates financial loss associat
ed with a time sequence of decisions on chemical control as a function
of crop development, population growth, and damage. Four sources of u
ncertainty were quantified: model parameters, incidence sample estimat
es, future average daily temperature, and white noise. Uncertainty abo
ut the first two sources is controllable because it decreases when mor
e information is collected. Uncertainty about the last two sources is
uncontrollable, given the structure of the model. Uncertainty about mo
del output, characterized by its variance, is calculated by repeatedly
drawing realizations of the various sources of uncertainty, and calcu
lating financial loss after each draw. By processing new realizations
of these sources one by one, the contribution of each component to tot
al variance can be assessed using an adapted Monte Carlo procedure. Fo
r most relevant initial conditions and decision strategies the sources
of uncontrollable uncertainty cause more than half of the uncertainty
about model output. White noise in the relative growth rates of aphid
s and brown rust is the most important source of uncertainty. Resource
s for improvement of the model are most effectively allocated to studi
es of the population dynamics of aphids and brown rust.