We compare the outcome of the Copenhagen and the Berlin statistical mu
ltifragmentation models. The two models both start from the assumption
of an ensemble of various excited fragments at thermal and chemical e
quilibrium for an expanded nuclear system at a certain stage, the free
ze-out configuration. Details as the volume of this source, the intrin
sic excitation of the fragments, and the secondary decays are treated
quite differently. Also the technical level of the Monte Carlo samplin
g differs. Main characteristics such as total charged multiplicity, IM
F multiplicity, and total neutron yield are in reasonable agreement. T
hus the overall predictions are quite robust against details in the de
scription. Deviations are however seen for high energies (E > 6A MeV)
where fewer IMF's, fewer neutrons, and much more cu's are seen in the
Copenhagen model. The isotopic distribution of the very light fragmen
ts is more narrow than in the Berlin model.