Oligozoospermic and asthenozoospermic semen ejaculates, as well as cry
opreserved sperm samples prepared by the wash and swim-up procedure of
ten result in unsatisfactory sperm recovery rates. In this study the g
lass wool filter and the wash and swim-up preparation procedures were
compared on the basis of their 'effective' (number of live sperm per m
illilitre) recovery rates. The glass wool filter procedure consistantl
y produced significantly (P = 0.0002) higher viable sperm concentratio
ns, making it the preferred method for the preparation of cryopreserve
d sperm to be used in assisted reproduction techniques. The use of thi
s preparation procedure has also been shown to have no adverse affect
on the fertilizing potential of human spermatozoa in our unit.