Jt. Trumble et al., ECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT OF A SUSTAINABLE INTEGRATED PEST-MANAGEMENT PROGRAM IN CELERY, Journal of economic entomology, 90(1), 1997, pp. 139-146
Studies were conducted on celery plantings in 1992 and 1993 (experimen
tal plantings) and 1995 (commercial field) that compared the benefit o
f current chemical standard pesticide practices with an integrated pes
t management (IPM) program based on B. thuringiensis. In experimental
plantings at a field station, the chemical standard treatment consiste
d of 9 applications of methomyl and permethrin. The IPM program used 3
or 4 applications of B, thuringiensis, the need for which was determi
ned by sampling insect populations for established thresholds. Each co
ntrol program was evaluated for yield, crop value, and cost of the con
trol strategies. A partial budget was constructed that determined net
profits for all treatments. Both he chemical standard and IPM treatmen
ts reduced pest populations and damage, resulting in better yield and
net profits as compared with the control treatment. The reduced input
costs of the IPM program resulted in better economic returns in both y
ears. In 1992, net profits were higher by $1,485/ha. In 1993, when cel
ery prices were lower, net profits with the IPM program were higher by
$614/ha. The program was validated in 1995 on a commercial celery ope
ration in Ventura County California. The IPM program generated a net p
rofit more than $410/ha higher than that of the grower's chemical prog
ram. Because reduced potential for insecticide resistance in the IPM p
rogram was not accounted for in the economic analysis, and the validat
ion trials were conducted on a progressive operation using approximate
to 40% fewer pesticides than most celery producers, the results of th
e economic analyses are conservative.