L. Mascarenhas et al., SUPEROVULATION AND TIMED INTERCOURSE - CAN IT PROVIDE A REASONABLE ALTERNATIVE FOR THOSE UNABLE TO AFFORD ASSISTED CONCEPTION, Human reproduction, 9(1), 1994, pp. 67-70
Superovulation was performed prospectively with pure follicle stimulat
ing hormone (FSH) to a group of 224 infertile patients with ovulatory
factor (51), male factor (60), mild/moderate endometriosis (24) and un
explained infertility (72). The aim was to produce three or four leadi
ng follicles in order to compensate for a 'deficient' factor. Ovulatio
n was induced with human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) and monitoring
was performed entirely by serial transvaginal ultrasound on alternate
cycles up to a maximum of six cycles (1120 treatment cycles) with inte
rvening cycles being used as self-controls (932 rest cycles). A furthe
r control group of 56 patients was matched for age, category and durat
ion of infertility and was only scanned serially (336 control cycles).
Seventy-four pregnancies were achieved and 54 delivered, giving a cum
ulative pregnancy rate per couple of 33% and a cumulative take home ba
by rate of 24% per couple after a maximum of six cycles of treatment.
When compared with the rest or control cycles, treatment was significa
ntly effective for ovulatory (P < 0.001), mild/moderate endometriosis
(P < 0.01) and unexplained infertility (P < 0.01) but not for male inf
ertility. Furthermore, pregnancy was five times more likely during the
first four treatment cycles (P = 0.00006, odds ratio = 5) at the expe
nse of a significant multiple pregnancy rate (18.9%) and mild/moderate
ovarian hyperstimulation rate (12%). We conclude that four cycles of
superovulation should be routinely offered to couples on waiting lists
for assisted conception or to those unable to afford it, in anovulato
ry, mild/moderate endometriosis and unexplained infertility. These res
ults need confirmation by a prospective multi-centre randomized study.