SUPEROVULATION AND TIMED INTERCOURSE - CAN IT PROVIDE A REASONABLE ALTERNATIVE FOR THOSE UNABLE TO AFFORD ASSISTED CONCEPTION

Citation
L. Mascarenhas et al., SUPEROVULATION AND TIMED INTERCOURSE - CAN IT PROVIDE A REASONABLE ALTERNATIVE FOR THOSE UNABLE TO AFFORD ASSISTED CONCEPTION, Human reproduction, 9(1), 1994, pp. 67-70
Citations number
8
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Biology
Journal title
ISSN journal
02681161
Volume
9
Issue
1
Year of publication
1994
Pages
67 - 70
Database
ISI
SICI code
0268-1161(1994)9:1<67:SATI-C>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
Superovulation was performed prospectively with pure follicle stimulat ing hormone (FSH) to a group of 224 infertile patients with ovulatory factor (51), male factor (60), mild/moderate endometriosis (24) and un explained infertility (72). The aim was to produce three or four leadi ng follicles in order to compensate for a 'deficient' factor. Ovulatio n was induced with human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) and monitoring was performed entirely by serial transvaginal ultrasound on alternate cycles up to a maximum of six cycles (1120 treatment cycles) with inte rvening cycles being used as self-controls (932 rest cycles). A furthe r control group of 56 patients was matched for age, category and durat ion of infertility and was only scanned serially (336 control cycles). Seventy-four pregnancies were achieved and 54 delivered, giving a cum ulative pregnancy rate per couple of 33% and a cumulative take home ba by rate of 24% per couple after a maximum of six cycles of treatment. When compared with the rest or control cycles, treatment was significa ntly effective for ovulatory (P < 0.001), mild/moderate endometriosis (P < 0.01) and unexplained infertility (P < 0.01) but not for male inf ertility. Furthermore, pregnancy was five times more likely during the first four treatment cycles (P = 0.00006, odds ratio = 5) at the expe nse of a significant multiple pregnancy rate (18.9%) and mild/moderate ovarian hyperstimulation rate (12%). We conclude that four cycles of superovulation should be routinely offered to couples on waiting lists for assisted conception or to those unable to afford it, in anovulato ry, mild/moderate endometriosis and unexplained infertility. These res ults need confirmation by a prospective multi-centre randomized study.