T. Barihuta et al., RAPID, EARLY AND SPECIFIC DIAGNOSIS OF TUBERCULOSIS AND OTHER MYCOBACTERIAL DISEASES IN BURUNDI, Annales de la Societe belge de medecine tropicale, 73, 1993, pp. 41-51
The potential usefulness of ELISA based serological tests to assist in
rapid, early and specific diagnosis of tuberculosis was investigated.
The materials were selected, based on published data and on our preli
minary findings. Initially screening tests were performed using crude
antigens such as Purified Protein Derivate (PPD) and a BCG-filtrate. U
nfortunately, the results with these antigens were not promising. The
specificity of both antigens using sera from 94 healthy controls was 6
4%. As a consequence of these findings, the crude antigens were exclud
ed from further tests, and the study was continued with purified antig
ens. The work focused on 2 purified proteins: Antigen 60 (A60), a lipo
polysaccharide-protein complex, and P32, a stress protein produced in
zinc deprived cultures, identified as Antigen 85 A in the BCG referenc
e system, both isolated from Mycobacterium bovis BCG. The commercial A
60 based ELISA and our own P32 based ELISA were used to test a total o
f 300 sera from HIV positive, negative and unscreened individuals, mai
nly originating from Burundi. These sera were collected from clinical
established cases of pulmonary TB, extrapulmonary TB, and patients wit
h non-tuberculous tropical diseases such as salmonellosis, trypanosomi
asis, malaria, etc. and healthy individuals. The A60 based ELISA had a
sensitivity of 76.8 % for the proven cases of active pulmonary tuberc
ulosis and 61.9 % for the extrapulmonary tuberculosis cases. No differ
ence was shown between HIV positive and HIV negative patients. Specifi
city reached 95.2 % for healthy individuals, but dropped to 68.1 % whe
n persons with active non-tuberculous tropical diseases were included.
Eighty-six percent of the pulmonary cases and 87.7 % of the extrapulm
onary cases were detected by the ELISA-P32. These findings suggest tha
t this test might be useful as a confirmatory test for the diagnosis o
f extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Again no difference was noticed between
HIV negative and positive patients. The main contraindication for the
use of the ELISA-P32 for the diagnosis of tuberculosis is its low spe
cificity: 70.2 % with sera from healthy controls and 22.2 % for hospit
alised patients and persons with non-tuberculous tropical diseases. In
a small recent prospective study 4 out of 10 HIV+ persons with no evi
dence for TB yielded a positive result for the ELISA-P32. Two of them
developed pulmonary tuberculosis within 6 months, whereas 2 P32-positi
ves and 6 P32-negatives remained up to now without any manifestations
of tuberculosis. The difference was not significant, but the number of
cases was limited. To avoid false positive reactions, two specific li
pid antigens isolated from M. tuberculosis were selected : Sulfolipid
IV (SLIV), a diacyl trehalose sulfate, and Phenolic Glycolipid Tbl (PG
LTb1), a glycolipid. Most of the testing was done with SLIV, where a s
pecificity of 81.2 % was reached among control sera. When only 'health
y' persons (HIV negatives and positives) were included, the specificit
y increased to 87%. The test detected 75.0 % of the pulmonary TB cases
and 52.0% of the tuberculous lymphadenitis cases. Our results are pro
mising and further studies on the usefulness of the ELISA-P32, ELISA-S
LIV and other antigens, in confirming active tuberculosis or predictin
g reactivation in HIV + persons, should be pursued on a larger number
of subjects. In view of the low specificity of the ELISA-P32 among pat
ients with other diseases, research on the possible occurence of cross
reactions with shared epitopes among other etiological agents is bein
g studied in collaboration with the Erasmus Hospital in Brussels (Drow
art and coworkers). Although a good diagnostic ELISA test (with both h
igh sensitivity and specificity) for the detection of active tuberculo
sis still needs to be developed, our findings and those of others woul
d suggest that it is possible to improve or modify existing tests by i
dentifying specific epitopes and careful application of these tests to
high risk groups.