Politics is common to organizations, particularly at the top levels, w
here decisions, actions, and performance carry the most weight. The mo
st politicized event of all is executive performance evaluation. Ln th
is article, Dennis A. Gioia and Clinton O. Longenecker explore the dyn
amics of politics in the executive appraisal process. They find that e
xecutives strongly believe their performance evaluations are vulnerabl
e to political activity, and that a wide variety of factors-including
personal connections, reputation, a superior's personal agenda, the am
biguous nature of executive work, and the overall political atmosphere
of an organization-can affect performance ratings as well as subseque
nt pay raises, promotions, and perks. The authors point to some of the
consequences of politically influenced appraisals, then lay out their
recommendations for reducing the negative effects.