We investigate the relation between the notions of knowledge and belie
f. Contrary to the well-known slogan about knowledge being ''justified
, true belief'', we propose that belief be viewed as defeasible knowle
dge. We offer several related definitions of belief as knowledge-relat
ive-to-assumptions, and provide complete axiomatic systems for the res
ulting notions of belief. We also show a close tie between our definit
ions and the literature on nonmonotonic reasoning. Our definitions of
belief have several advantages. First, they are short. Second, we do n
ot need to add anything to the logic of knowledge: the ''right'' prope
rties of belief fall out of our definitions and the properties of know
ledge. Third, the connection between knowledge and belief is derived f
rom one fundamental principle. Finally, a major attraction of logics o
f knowledge in computer science has been the concrete grounding of the
mental notion in objective phenomena; by reducing belief to knowledge
we obtain this grounding for a notion of belief.