Extinction of counterflow diffusion flames on liquid fuels was investi
gated, to confirm the superiority of the counterflow diffusion flame o
ver the cup burner method for measuring flame extinguishing concentrat
ions of fire suppressants, and to examine the fire suppression effects
of halon replacements. The flame extinguishing concentration for the
counterflow flame was less sensitive to the burner size than that for
the cup homer method. Furthermore, the flow velocity of the fuel vapor
had no change when the suppressant concentration in the oxidizer mixt
ure of the counterflow diffusion flame was varied, whereas it changed
remarkably in the case of the clip burner flame. The flame extinguishi
ng concentrations of nitrogen, carbon dioxide, halon 1301 (CF3Br), and
three kinds of hydrofluorocarbons (HFC) and perfluorocarbon (FC) for
n-heptane or ethanol counterflow flames were measured at various strai
n rates. Adiabatic flame temperatures at the extinction concentrations
were calculated using the flame extinguishing concentrations measured
for counterflow flames, assuming various equivalence ratios. The resu
lts suggest that HFC-23 (CHF3) suppression exhibits a higher contribut
ion to the chemical suppression effect than other HFC or FC. Copyright
(C) 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd.