MOLECULAR-DYNAMICS AND STATIC SOLVATION STUDIES OF AMILORIDE

Citation
Ra. Buono et al., MOLECULAR-DYNAMICS AND STATIC SOLVATION STUDIES OF AMILORIDE, Journal of the American Chemical Society, 116(4), 1994, pp. 1502-1513
Citations number
110
Categorie Soggetti
Chemistry
ISSN journal
00027863
Volume
116
Issue
4
Year of publication
1994
Pages
1502 - 1513
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-7863(1994)116:4<1502:MASSSO>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
The GROMOS molecular mechanics and dynamics force field was extended a nd modified in order to investigate the static and dynamic conformatio nal properties of amiloride conformers in solution. Torsional potentia l functions, Lennard-Jones parameters, and atomic point charges were d erived for the free base and protonated species of amiloride. The effe ct of solvent on the conformation, energy, and intramolecular hydrogen bonding patterns of the free base (A1 and A4) and protonated (F1) spe cies of amiloride was examined by 25-ps simulations of each species in a bath of SPC water molecules. The large torsional barriers for A1 to A4 and F1 to F4 conversion, determined from 3-21G molecular orbital calculations, were found to constrain the average structure of each sp ecies to a nearly-planar conformation. This suggests that amiloride bi nds to the ion channel in a planar conformation. In agreement with pre vious ab initio calculations, the molecular dynamics simulations found the relative internal energy of the Al conformer to be lower than tha t of A4. However, the solute-solvent interaction energy was lower for A4 than A1, consistent with the larger dipole moment of A4. Combined, these trends still predict the A1 conformer to be more stable in solut ion than A4. Static solvation studies of amiloride with an induced pol arization charge boundary element (IPCBE) continuum solvent method, th e Langevin dipole method, and the self-consistent reaction field metho d gave qualitatively similar results. These results help to clarify th e NMR studies of Smith et al. (J. Am. Chem. Sec, 1979, 101, 191), who were unable to distinguish between the A1 and A4 conformers in solutio n. Calculation of the electrostatic contribution to both the relative hydration enthalpy and the relative hydration free energy of amiloride conformers using the IPCBE method showed that the maximum difference in these quantities is about 4%.