Ov. Lipp et al., EFFECTS OF MISCUING ON PAVLOVIAN CONDITIONED RESPONDING AND ON PROBE REACTION-TIME, Australian journal of psychology, 45(3), 1993, pp. 161-167
Two experiments examined the effect of the miscuing of an unconditione
d stimulus on Pavlovian conditioned responding. In Experiment 1 (N = 3
2), subjects received 12 CS+-US and 12 CS- presentations followed, in
the experimental group, by a CS--US pairing (miscuing) on Trial 25 and
a CS+-US pairing on Trial 26. For the control group, Trial 25 consist
ed of a CS--alone presentation and Trial 26 consisted of a CS+-US pair
ing. Visual stimuli (geometric shapes) of 8-s duration served as CSs,
and a 1-s burst of white noise (100 dBA) was used as the US. Both elec
trodermal activity and a continuous measure of US expectancy were obta
ined. Expectancy of the US was significantly lower in the experimental
group than in the control on the CS+-US trial which followed miscuing
, whereas electrodermal responses to the US were significantly larger.
However, first- and second-interval responses during CS+ on this tria
l were not influenced by miscuing. Experiment 2 (N = 64) employed the
same stimuli and procedures as used in Experiment 1, but the dependent
measure was reaction time to a probe stimulus presented either early
(300 ms) or late (7500 ms) during some CSs+ and some CSs-. During the
acquisition phase, probe reaction time was slower during CS+ than duri
ng CS- regardless of probe position. Moreover, reaction time to probes
presented during CS+ on the trial which followed miscuing was slower
in the experimental group than in the control irrespective of probe po
sition. Although not all findings were as predicted, the present resul
ts suggest that a CS-US pairing disrupted the association between CSand the US. This effect of US miscuing is difficult to interpret withi
n the framework of current theories of Pavlovian conditioning.