R. Bare et al., CORRELATION OF PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN AND PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN DENSITY WITH OUTCOME OF PROSTATE BIOPSY, Urology, 43(2), 1994, pp. 191-196
Objective. We attempt to correlate prebiopsy serum prostate-specific a
ntigen (PSA) concentration and prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD
) with histologic results of prostate biopsy. Method. Sixty-two consec
utive patients underwent prostate biopsy because of elevated PSA great
er than 4 ng/mL and/or abnormal findings on digital rectal examination
(DRE). PSAD was calculated from dividing the serum PSA concentration
by the prostate volume as determined by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS).
PSA and PSAD were compared to biopsy outcome. Results. The mean PSAD
values of the cancer versus noncancer (benign prostatic tissue, benign
prostatic hyperplasia, and prostatitis) groups were significantly dif
ferent (p < 0.019). However, there was great overlap in individual val
ues. The mean PSA levels of the cancer versus noncancer groups also we
re significantly different (p < 0.0079). In patients with PSA levels b
etween 4 and 10 ng/mL, 11 of 32 (34%) had positive biopsy findings for
cancer. Eleven of 29 patients (38%) with normal DRE findings and elev
ated PSA levels (> 4 ng/mL) had positive biopsy findings for cancer. S
even of 19 patients (37%) with normal DRE findings and elevated PSA le
vels between 4 and 10 ng/mL had positive biopsy specimens for cancer.
Conclusions. PSAD, though suggestive, is not definitive for cancer or
noncancer. Patients with inflammation (prostatitis) present in their b
iopsy specimens have serum PSA levels and PSAD values intermediate bet
ween those with benign tissue (without inflammation) and cancer. We th
ink that prostate biopsy is important in patients with PSA levels betw
een 4 and 10 ng/mL even if their DRE result is normal, as our data ind
icate that over one third of these patients harbor detectable prostate
cancer