Et. Wittbrodt et Sa. Spinler, PREVENTION OF ANAPHYLACTOID REACTIONS IN HIGH-RISK PATIENTS RECEIVINGRADIOGRAPHIC CONTRAST-MEDIA, The Annals of pharmacotherapy, 28(2), 1994, pp. 236-241
OBJECTIVE: To review various pretreatment regimens for the prophylaxis
of anaphylactoid reactions to radiographic contrast media (RCM) in hi
gh-risk patients. The proposed etiologies and risk factors for such re
actions are also reviewed. DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE search of the Engli
sh-language literature was used to identify pertinent human studies an
d reviews. STUDY SELECTION: All studies comparing pretreatment regimen
s for anaphylactoid reactions to RCM were reviewed as well as studies
comparing the incidence of anaphylactoid reactions between lower and h
igher osmolar RCM. DATA SYNTHESIS: The two types of reactions to RCM a
re the dose-independent, unpredictable anaphylactoid (pseudoallergic o
r idiosyncratic) reactions and the dose-dependent, predictable physico
chemical (intrinsic, nonidiosyncratic) reactions. Prophylaxis of the f
ormer type is targeted at stemming the effects of certain chemical med
iators, primarily histamine. The use of lower osmolar RCM is associate
d with a lower incidence of anaphylactoid reactions compared with high
er osmolar RCM, but is significantly more expensive. Risk factors for
such reactions are a history of previous anaphylactoid reaction to RCM
, asthma, and reaction to skin allergens or penicillin. Discontinuatio
n of any beta-blockers before the procedure is suggested. Pretesting p
atients with a small amount of RCM has little predictive value for an
anaphylactoid reaction. Various pretreatment prophylactic regimens hav
e been studied. Almost all included a corticosteroid to target the inf
lammatory response and a histamine, (H-1)-antagonist to blunt the effe
cts of histamine. In some clinical trials, ephedrine was added for bro
nchodilation and cimetidine for its antagonism at die histamine2-recep
tor. The few controlled clinical trials that have been performed show
the combination of prednisone and diphenhydramine to be most beneficia
l in preventing anaphylactoid reactions to RCM. The addition of ephedr
ine or cimetidine to a pretreatment regimen remains controversial. CON
CLUSIONS: More controlled clinical studies comparing various pretreatm
ent regimens for high-risk patients need to be performed, especially i
n patients receiving lower osmolar RCM. Recommendations for high-risk
patients who must receive RCM include use of a lower osmolar agent, pr
etreatment with a corticosteroid and an H-1-antagonist, discontinuatio
n of beta-blockers if the patient is taking any, and bedside availabil
ity of appropriate medications and equipment to treat anaphylaxis.