Legislatures have employed a variety of strategies in their attempts t
o influence the interpretation of statutes, one strategy involves the
use of ''interpretive directions,'' statutory provisions that direct c
ourts to interpret statutes in a particular way. In this Note, Mr. Rom
ero analyzes the effectiveness and desirability of interpretive direct
ions. He raises both constitutional and practical objections to the us
e of interpretive directions, and discusses possible judicial response
s to such legislative action. He concludes that legislatures can best
control the application of the laws by taking more care in drafting th
e substantive provisions of statutes rather than by enacting interpret
ive directions.