Ha. Gaissert et al., TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT RESTORATION OF AIRWAY CONTINUITY WITH THE TRACHEAL T-TUBE, Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 107(2), 1994, pp. 600-606
The advantages of the tracheal T-tube compared with a regular tracheos
tomy tube are a physiologic direction of air flow, preservation of lar
yngeal phonation, and superior patient acceptance. Between 1968 and 19
91, 140 patients aged 7 months to 95 years underwent placement of T-,
TY- (n = 7), or a modified extended T-tube (n = 4). Primary diagnosis
was postintubation stenosis in 86 patients, burn injury in 13 patients
, malignant airway tumors in 12 patients, and various disorders in 29
patients, Stenting with a silicone rubber tube was temporary in 31 pat
ients and 14 underwent later operative reconstruction. Definitive perm
anent insertion was performed in 49 patients. A modified tube was used
in 4 patients with left main bronchial stenosis with effective long-t
erm palliation in 3. Postoperative airway obstruction prompted placeme
nt in 32 patients. Positioning of the T-tube above the vocal cords in
12 patients for subglottic stenosis was effective in 10. The T-tube wa
s not tolerated in 28 patients (20%) because of obstruction of the upp
er limb or aspiration. Five of 10 patients under the age of 10 years h
ad airway obstruction necessitating tube removal. Long-term intubation
in 112 patients exceeded 1 year in 49 patients and 5 years in 12 pati
ents. Only 5 patients required tube removal for obstructive problems m
ore than 2 months after placement. The tracheal T-tube restores airway
patency reliably with excellent long-term results and represents the
preferred management of chronic airway obstruction not amenable to sur
gical reconstruction.