Eg. Reinhardt et al., GEOARCHAEOLOGY OF THE ANCIENT HARBOR SITE OF CAESAREA MARITIMA, ISRAEL - EVIDENCE FROM SEDIMENTOLOGY AND PALEOECOLOGY OF BENTHIC FORAMINIFERA, Journal of foraminiferal research, 24(1), 1994, pp. 37-48
Foraminiferal analysis and C-14 dating of a core obtained from the ent
rance of the ancient harbor site of Caesarea Maritima, Israel provided
paleo-environmental information which has enhanced previous archaeolo
gical interpretations. This integrated micropaleontological-sedimentol
ogical approach presents a new tool for solving marine archaeological
problems. Four distinct sedimentological units related to the harbor's
history were recognized: preharbor deposits, harbor construction rubb
le, harbor and post harbor deposits. The sediments from the active har
bor were characterized by mud, interrupted by intervals of coarse sand
deposited during large low periodicity (25-50 years) storms. The area
outside the harbor moles was continuously under the influence of wave
action resulting in deposition of a coarse sandy substrate. The sedim
ent distribution corresponded with two distinct foraminiferal assembla
ges: Biofacies 1 was related to a low energy muddy substrate and was c
haracterized by Ammonia tepida, Cornuspira foliacea, Haynesina depress
ula and Triloculina subgranulata; Biofacies 2 was related to a high en
ergy sand substrate and was characterized by Ammonia parkinsoniana and
Porosononion granosum. Sedimentological and foraminiferal evidence as
well as C-14 dates indicated that the mud was from the active harbor
(commissioned in 21 BC) and that the harbor was no longer functioning
according to its original design probably by the mid third century and
definitely by no later than 490 AD. Previous research had suggested t
hat the degradation of the harbor was most likely related to tectonic
movement of the area. However, the timing of this event was not exactl
y known. Archaeologists have speculated that the Byzantine Emperor Ana
stasius I refurbished the harbor in the early 6th century. The results
of this study have indicated that, even if this reconstruction did oc
cur, the harbor was not returned to its original design or function.