T. Cherian et al., USE OF PCR-ENZYME IMMUNOASSAY FOR IDENTIFICATION OF INFLUENZA A VIRUSMATRIX RNA IN CLINICAL-SAMPLES NEGATIVE FOR CULTIVABLE VIRUS, Journal of clinical microbiology, 32(3), 1994, pp. 623-628
Influenza A virus infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortal
ity worldwide. Standard diagnostic methods either are not efficient in
identifying infected individuals in a timely manner or lack sensitivi
ty. We developed a PCR-enzyme immunoassay (PCR-EIA) for the detection
of influenza A virus RNA in respiratory secretions. A reverse transcri
ption PCR was performed with oligonucleotide primers directed at a hig
hly conserved area of the influenza A matrix gene. Amplified DNA was i
dentified by hybridization in solution to a nested biotinylated RNA pr
obe and quantitated in an EIA. PCR-EIA detected small quantities of RN
A from the three prevalent subtypes of human influenza A virus. Influe
nza B and C, parainfluenza, measles, mumps, and respiratory syncytial
viruses tested negative. The potential efficiency of PCR-EIA for use i
n clinical diagnosis was determined by testing 90 nasal wash specimens
obtained daily over a 10-day period from nine human volunteers infect
ed with influenza A virus. Thirty-seven of the postinfection samples h
ad detectable influenza A virus RNA by PCR-EIA, whereas only 26 postin
fection samples were positive by culture. PCR-EIA was particularly eff
icient for the identification of influenza A virus in samples obtained
more than 4 days after infection. Seventeen of 45 such samples were p
ositive, whereas virus was cultivated from 4 samples (P < 0.00005). Al
l preinfection samples from volunteers subsequently infected with infl
uenza A virus were negative by PCR-EIA, as were samples from a volunte
er infected with parainfluenza virus type 3. Nucleic acid amplificatio
n techniques represent important tools for the timely and sensitive di
agnosis of influenza A virus infections and, therefore, their manageme
nt and control.