DETECTION OF BACTEREMIA BY DIFCO ESP BLOOD CULTURE SYSTEM

Citation
Ja. Morello et al., DETECTION OF BACTEREMIA BY DIFCO ESP BLOOD CULTURE SYSTEM, Journal of clinical microbiology, 32(3), 1994, pp. 811-818
Citations number
11
Categorie Soggetti
Microbiology
ISSN journal
00951137
Volume
32
Issue
3
Year of publication
1994
Pages
811 - 818
Database
ISI
SICI code
0095-1137(1994)32:3<811:DOBBDE>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
In a mulicenter study, the Difco ESP blood culture system (Difco Labor atories, Detroit, Mich.) was compared with the BACTEC NR660 system (Be cton Dickinson Diagnostic Instrument Systems, Sparks, Md.). The ESP sy stem monitors each blood culture bottle every 12 to 24 min to detect c hanges in oxygen consumption and gas production by microbes. Equal vol umes of blood were inoculated into aerobic ESP-80A and BACTEC 6A, 16A, or PEDS Plus broths and anaerobic ESP-80N and BACTEC 7A or 17A broths and were incubated for up to 7 days. ESP bottles contain supplemented tryptic soy broth without antimicrobial agent-adsorbing resins. From 7,532 aerobic compliant sets, the ESP system detected 356 clinically s ignificant positive cultures and the BACTEC NR660 system detected 329. From 6,007 anaerobic cultures, the ESP system detected 234 clinically significant positive cultures and the BACTEC NR660 system detected 19 8. In aerobic broths, 292 organisms were: isolated from both systems a nd 78 organisms were isolated from the ESP system alone, whereas 54 or ganisms were isolated from the BACTEC NR660 system alone (P < 0.05). A mong individual organisms, pneumococci were isolated significantly mor e often in ESP aerobic broths. In anaerobic broths, 180 organisms were isolated from both systems and 68 organisms were isolated from the ES P system alone, whereas 35 organisms were isolated from the BACTEC NR6 60 system alone (P < 0.05). Aerobic gram-positive organisms as a group and Candida spp. were isolated significantly more often in ESP anaero bic broths; Both systems detected 207 clinically significant bacteremi c episodes and the ESP system alone detected 63, whereas the BACTEC NR 660 system alone detected 32 (P < 0.05). Significantly more episodes o f bacteremia caused by Staphylococcus epidermidis and anaerobes were d etected by the ESP system. The differences in the numbers of organisms detected >6 h earlier in ESP broths compared with BACTEC NR660 broths were significant, as were earlier times to detection. Although the to tal number of organisms detected was not significantly different, the ESP system alone detected more organisms in a shorter time than did th e BACTEC NR660 system alone. The continuous monitoring capability of t he ESP system makes it an attractive alternative to the BACTEC NR660 s ystem.