NORMAL EPIDIDYMAL ANATOMY IN BOYS

Citation
Pj. Turek et al., NORMAL EPIDIDYMAL ANATOMY IN BOYS, The Journal of urology, 151(3), 1994, pp. 726-727
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00225347
Volume
151
Issue
3
Year of publication
1994
Pages
726 - 727
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-5347(1994)151:3<726:NEAIB>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
It is accepted that a range of epididymal anomalies exists in boys wit h cryptorchidism, varying from ductal patency aberrations to abnormal attachments of the epididymis to the testes or even complete absence. Despite several series characterizing these variations, there are few studies of normal controls for comparison. We document normal epididym al anatomy in boys. During an 18-month period ending in 1991, 94 boys (mean age 4.8 years, range 1 month to 18 years) underwent inguinal or scrotal exploration unrelated to cryptorchidism. Epididymal anatomy wa s recorded for all exposed testes. Indications for surgery included hy drocele or hernia in 85 boys, torsion in 8 and varicocele in 1. A tota l of 112 epididymides was examined and the configurations were recorde d as type 1 - head and tail attachment with a ''looped'' body in 94 of 112 cases (83.9%), type 2 - complete attachment to the testis in 14 ( 12.5%), type 3 - head attachment only in 3 (2.7%), type 4 - tail attac hment only in 0 (0%), type 5 - nonfusion in 1 (0.9%) and type 6 - anom alies of ductal patency in 0 (0%). These data reveal that the most com mon epididymal configuration in normal boys is a looped epididymis wit h the head and tail attached (84%) followed by complete fusion with th e testes (12.5%). Other variations are rare. Absence of the epididymis was not observed.