R. Fogari et al., COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF ACIPIMOX AND PRAVASTATIN IN PATIENTS WITH COMBINED HYPERLIPIDEMIA, International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 35(2), 1997, pp. 61-64
The aim of this study was to evaluate the lipid-lowering effect of aci
pimox as compared to pravastatin in patients with combined hyperlipide
mia. One hundred and six subjects, all males, aged 18-60 years, with t
otal cholesterol (TC) greater than or equal to 200 mg/dl, TC/HDL-C rat
io greater than or equal to 5, triglycerides (TG) greater than or equa
l to 200 and greater than or equal to 350 mg/dl were randomized to rec
eive acipimox 250 mg thrice daily or pravastatin 20 mg once daily for
3 months, according to a double-blind, double-dummy design. After a 1-
month wash-out period patients were crossed to the alternative regimen
for further 3 months. Prior to and at the end of each treatment perio
d, TC, LDL-C, HDL-C, TG, blood glucose, and fibrinogen were evaluated.
Both acipimox and pravastatin significantly decreased TC, LDL-C, TC/H
DL-C ratio and TG and increased HDL-C, without affecting plasma glucos
e. However, at the dosages employed in the study acipimox was more eff
ective in reducing TG and increasing HDL-C levels, whereas pravastatin
was more efficient in decreasing TC and LDL-C. There was no differenc
e between the 2 treatments in their effects on TC/HDL-C ratio. Unlike
pravastatin acipimox caused a slight but significant reduction in fibr
inogen plasma levels. No serious adverse event was observed with eithe
r drug, but a major incidence of side-effects was reported during trea
tment with acipimox. Our findings suggest that, although both drugs at
the standard dose employed in the study were effective in improving t
he lipid profile; in the treatment of combined hyperlipidemia acipimox
might be preferable in the presence of more pronounced hypertriglycer
idemia with low levels of HDL-C, whereas pravastatin might be more use
ful when hypercholesterolemia is predominant.