Rc. Coombes et al., RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF EPIRUBICIN VERSUS FLUOROURACIL IN ADVANCED GASTRIC-CANCER - AN INTERNATIONAL-COLLABORATIVE-CANCER-GROUP (ICCG) STUDY, Annals of oncology, 5(1), 1994, pp. 33-36
Background: It is not yet established whether doses of epirubicin equi
toxic to adriamycin are more effective in the treatment of locally adv
anced or metastatic gastric cancer. Patients and methods: Seventy pati
ents with advanced gastric cancer were randomised to receive fluoroura
cil (500 mg/m(2) days 1-5 every three weeks) or epirubicin (100 mg/m(2
) every three weeks), with doses escalating to a maximum dose of 700 m
g/m(2) of fluorouracil or 140 mg/m(2) of epirubicin. Results: No patie
nts attained complete response. Partial response was seen in 3 patient
s in the epirubicin arm (8%) compared with 2 patients in the fluoroura
cil arm (6%). No statistically significant difference between the two
treatments was seen in either response or survival. Severe side effect
s, particularly alopecia, and nausea and vomiting were more common in
the epirubicin arm (45% and 37%, respectively) compared with the fluor
ouracil arm (12% and 8%, respectively). Conclusions: Our trial demonst
rates that fluorouracil and epirubicin as single agents have comparabl
e but insufficient activity in advanced gastric cancer.