M. Stockschlader et al., LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP OF LEUKEMIA PATIENTS AFTER RELATED CRYOPRESERVED ALLOGENEIC BONE-MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, British Journal of Haematology, 96(2), 1997, pp. 382-386
We have previously shown that allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (
BMT) with cryopreserved donor marrow cells can be used without prolong
ing the engraftment time or interfering with the reconstitution of hae
mopoiesis. In this report we extend our initial observations of the fi
rst 40 patients who underwent allogeneic bone marrow transplantation f
rom related donors with cryopreserved donor bone marrow for haematolog
ical malignancies, including the long-term follow-up data of the previ
ously reported patients. The outcome of these patients was compared wi
th that of 40 related BMT recipients receiving fresh donor bone marrow
(historic control group). Time until engraftment of all patients rece
iving cryopreserved bone marrow was not different from the control gro
up (ANC>0.5 x 10(9)/l 17 d (range 11-24 d) versus 17.5 d (range 10-28
d); platelets>20 x 10(9)/l 21 d (range 11-85 d) versus 22 d (range 13-
69 d), respectively). There was the same incidence of acute and chroni
c GvHD in patients receiving either cryopreserved bone marrow or fresh
bone marrow (acute GvHD greater than or equal to II 61% v 60% and chr
onic GvHD 56% v 52%, respectively). Chimaerism studies showed no diffe
rence between the patient groups. Furthermore, the two groups did not
differ in day 100 survival (82% v 72%). With a median follow-up of 520
d (range 47-1365 d) and 1289 d (range 48-1849 d), 60% of the patients
receiving cryopreserved and 53% of the patients receiving fresh allog
eneic donor bone marrow respectively, are alive. We conclude that cryo
preservation of allogeneic related donor bone marrow does not adversel
y affect engraftment, does not decrease the incidence of severe acute
GvHD, and does not seem to affect the day 100 survival or long-term ha
emopoiesis.