Rd. Doverspike et al., NETWORK DESIGN SENSITIVITY STUDIES FOR USE OF DIGITAL CROSS-CONNECT SYSTEMS IN SURVIVABLE NETWORK ARCHITECTURES, IEEE journal on selected areas in communications, 12(1), 1994, pp. 69-78
This paper provides the results of an economic study on the use of SON
ET Digital Cross-connect Systems (DCS's) to provide survivable transmi
ssion network architectures in local exchange networks. Three fundamen
tal survivable transmission technologies are considered: 1) a SONET se
lf-healing ring, 2) a SONET point-to-point fiber system with 1:1 autom
atic protection switching and diverse routing of protection facilities
, and 3) a DCS mesh with automatic DCS restoration (rerouting) protect
ion. These three technologies are used in various combinations to form
six survivable network alternatives for evaluation. Two Local Exchang
e Carrier (LEC) networks are used (a 15 node network and a 53 node net
work) and demand, network connectivity, and unit equipment cost sensit
ivities are evaluated on these alternatives. In addition, the survivab
ility of each alternative in the event of a major node failure is calc
ulated. The motivation for the study is to determine the viability of
DCS-based survivable network architectures and, in particular, the via
bility of SONET DCS's with integrated optical terminations. The study
has two objectives: 1) given a specific survivable network technology,
underwhat conditions is it economical to place a Broadband DCS (B-DCS
) in a central office as opposed Add-Drop Multiplexers (ADM's); and 2)
which survivable technologies with B-DCS's are economical, and under
what conditions. We conclude that the most cost-effective networks con
sist of ''hybrids'' of SONET point-to-point, ring, and mesh technologi
es, and that the B-DCS is economically viable for interconnection betw
een these technologies.