The upper ocean's response to three hurricanes [Norbert( 1984), Joseph
ine(l984) and Gloria(1985)] is examined using held observations and a
numerical ocean model. Our goal is to describe the physical processes
that determine the structure and amplitude of hurricane-driven upper-o
cean currents. All three of these Northern Hemisphere hurricanes produ
ced a rightward-biased response of the mixed-layer current and transpo
rt. This asymmetry arises because the wind stress vector rotates clock
wise on the right side of the track and remains nearly parallel with t
he inertially rotating mixed-layer current during most of the hurrican
e passage. The maximum observed mixed-layer current varied from 0.8 m
s(-1) in response to Josephine, which was a large but comparatively we
ak hurricane, to 1.7 m s(-1) in response to Gloria, which was very lar
ge and also intense. These cases have been simulated with a three-dime
nsional numerical model that includes a treatment of wind-driven verti
cal mixing within the primitive equations. The simulations give a fair
ly good representation of the horizontal pattern and amplitude of the
mixed-layer current, accounting for over 80% of the variance of the ob
served current. Model skill varies considerably with the amplitude of
the mixed-layer Current, being much higher for stronger currents than
it is for weaker currents. This and other evidence suggest that a majo
r contributor to the difference between the observed and simulated cur
rents may be a noise component of the observed current that arises fro
m measurement and analysis error and from prehurricane currents. The N
orbert case was distinguished by a large Burger number, similar to 1/2
, which is a measure of pressure coupling between the forced stage mix
ed-layer currents and the relaxation stage thermocline currents. The o
bservations and the simulation show upwelling of up to 25 m and strong
thermocline-depth currents up to 0.3 m s(-1) under the rear half of N
orbert. Thermocline currents have a very simple vertical structure, a
monotonic decay with increasing depth, and nearly constant direction,
Their horizontal structure is more complex but appears to be due to an
acceleration toward a low pressure anomaly associated with the first
upwelling peak about 100 km behind the eye of Norbert.