D. Dormont et al., A TECHNIQUE OF MEASURING THE PRECISION OF AN MR-GUIDED STEREOTAXIC INSTALLATION USING ANATOMIC SPECIMENS, American journal of neuroradiology, 15(2), 1994, pp. 365-371
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences,"Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
PURPOSE: To develop a method for direct measurement, using anatomic sp
ecimens, of the precision of MR-guided stereotaxic location and to des
cribe its application to a 1.5-T MR unit with a Leksell stereotaxic fr
ame. METHODS: Small pieces of gelfoam (1X1X1 mm), soaked in gadopentet
ate dimeglumine, were stereotaxically introduced into formalin-fixed h
uman heads using a Leksell D (three experiments) or G (nine experiment
s) stereotaxic frame. The head and the frame were then introduced into
a 1.5-T MR unit. The target coordinates (as set on the stereotaxic fr
ame by one investigator) were then compared with the MR-determined ste
reotaxic coordinates (calculated independently by another investigator
). The imprecisions Ex, Ey, and Ez in each direction were defined as t
he differences between the calculated and. the chosen coordinates. RES
ULTS: Regarding the three targets studied with the D frame, mean impre
cision Ex was 1.08 +/- 0.50 mm (mean +/- SEM), Ey 0.83 +/- 0.58 mm, an
d Ez 0.75 +/- 0.25 mm. For the nine targets studied with the G frame,
Ex was 0.48 +/- 0.17 mm, Ey 0.69 +/- 0.14 mm, and Ez 0.82 +/- 0.13 mm.
Statistical analysis of the results showed no significant difference
between Ex or Ey and half the size of a pixel, indicating that, in the
axial plane, stereotaxic MR precision is limited only by pixel size.
A statistically significant difference was observed in the coronal pla
ne between Ez and half the size of a pixel, but it must be stressed th
at Ez remained smaller than 1 mm. CONCLUSION: MR-guided stereotaxic lo
cation can be used with confidence for most diagnostic, functional, an
d therapeutic procedures.