Recent criticisms of Head Start have arisen as a result of unrealistic
expectations; loosely generalized evidence; and misunderstood, incomp
lete research. But they have forced advocates to focus on administrati
ve problems that make Head Start less effective than it could be. This
healthy climate of critical discussion has led to plans to improve pr
ogram services and lo proceed with expansion in a more thoughtful mann
er. The debate has sparked further ideas to optimize the Head Start ap
proach and make the program more responsive to the needs of children a
nd families in poverty.