Mt. Collins et al., HERD PREVALENCE AND GEOGRAPHIC-DISTRIBUTION OF, AND RISK-FACTORS FOR,BOVINE PARATUBERCULOSIS IN WISCONSIN, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 204(4), 1994, pp. 636-641
A random sample of Wisconsin daily herds, stratified by herd size, wer
e tested for paratuberculosis by use of an absorbed ELISA procedure. T
he ELISA was optimized for overall accuracy by means of receiver opera
ting characteristic curve analysis, and had a sensitivity and specific
ity of 50.9 and 94.9%, respectively. Herd prevalence was analyzed for
correlation with responses to a management practices questionnaire com
pleted by the herd owners. One hundred and fifty-eight herds and 4,990
cattle were tested. Of these, 50% of herds and 7.29% of cattle had po
sitive test results. Calculation of true prevalence from the apparent
prevalence indicated that 4.79% of cattle and 34% of the Wisconsin dai
ry herds tested had serologic evidence of paratuberculosis. Among the
54 herds classified as positive on the basis of true prevalence estima
tion, the mean number of test positive cattle was 20.3% The geographic
distribution of herds with positive results was not uniform. More inf
ected herds were found in the southern and western districts of Wiscon
sin than in the eastern district. The west-central district had a larg
er number of infected herds than did other districts. By use of chi(2)
analysis, the only management factor found to be significantly associ
ated with herd prevalence was housing of carves after weaning (P = 0.0
3). Specifically, in herds with higher prevalence, calves were separat
ed after weaning into calf barns and hutches rather than into pens in
the cow barn more often than in herds with lower prevalence. This fact
or was also considered significant by use of logistic regression analy
sis. Logistic regression analysis also revealed that herd size and loc
ation of farm by district of the state were significantly related to h
erd paratuberculosis prevalence.