Cytosolic fructose-1,6-biphosphatases (FBPase, EC 3.1.3.11) from pea (
Pisum sativum L cv Lincoln) and spinach (Spinacia oleracea L. cv Winte
r Giant) did not cross-react by double immunodiffusion and western blo
tting with either of the antisera raised against the chloroplast enzym
e of both species; similarly, pea and spinach chloroplast FBPases did
not react with the spinach cytosolic FBPase antiserum. On the other ha
nd, spinach and pea chloroplast FBPases showed strong cross-reactions
against the antisera to chloroplast FBPases, in the same way that the
pea and spinach cytosolic enzymes displayed good cross-reactions again
st the antiserum to spinach cytosolic FBPase. Crude extracts from spin
ach and pea leaves, as well as the corresponding purified chloroplast
enzymes, showed by western blotting only one band (44 and 43 kD, respe
ctively) in reaction with either of the antisera against the chloropla
st enzymes. A unique fraction of molecular mass 38 kD appeared when ei
ther of the crude extracts or the purified spinach cytosolic FBPase we
re analyzed against the spinach cytosolic FBPase antiserum. These mole
cular sizes are in accordance with those reported for the subunits of
the photosynthetic and gluconeogenic FBPases. Chloroplast and cytosoli
c FBPases underwent increasing inactivation when increasing concentrat
ions of chloroplast or cytosolic anti-FBPase immunoglobulin G (IgG), r
espectively, were added to the reaction mixture. However, inactivation
s were not observed when the photosynthetic enzyme was incubated with
the IgG to cytosolic FBPase, or vice versa. Quantitative results obtai
ned by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) showed 77% common an
tigenic determinants between the two chloroplast enzymes when tested a
gainst the spinach photosynthetic FBPase antiserum, which shifted to 6
4% when assayed against the pea antiserum. In contrast, common antigen
ic determinants between the spinach cytosolic FBPase and the two chlor
oplast enzymes were less than 10% when the ELISA test was carried out
with either of the photosynthetic FBPase antisera, and only 5% when th
e assay was performed with the antiserum to the spinach cytosolic FBPa
se. These results were supported by sequencing data: the deduced amino
acid sequence of a chloroplast FBPase clone isolated from a pea cDNA
library indicated a 39,253 molecular weight protein, with a homology o
f 85% with the spinach chloroplast FBPase but only 48.5% with the cyto
solic enzyme from spinach.