STAGE AL PROSTATE-CANCER - FOLLOW-UP WITH DIGITAL RECTAL EXPLORATION,PROSTATE MARKERS, FINE-NEEDLE ASPIRATION, ULTRASONOGRAPHICALLY GUIDEDNEEDLE-BIOPSY AND BIOPSIES OF THE RESIDUAL PROSTATE WITH RESECTOSCOPE
G. Breda et al., STAGE AL PROSTATE-CANCER - FOLLOW-UP WITH DIGITAL RECTAL EXPLORATION,PROSTATE MARKERS, FINE-NEEDLE ASPIRATION, ULTRASONOGRAPHICALLY GUIDEDNEEDLE-BIOPSY AND BIOPSIES OF THE RESIDUAL PROSTATE WITH RESECTOSCOPE, European urology, 25(2), 1994, pp. 116-118
From January 1985 to December 1990, we performed 921 TURP and 23 retro
pubic adenomectomies. In 70 patients (7.4%) histological examination r
evealed an incidental carcinoma of the prostate (stage A), 51 of which
(72.8%) were A1 and 19 (27.2%) stage A2. In our classification A1 cov
ers cases with <3 G1 focal lesions [Boxer, 1977]. Thirteen of the A2 c
ases underwent radical prostatectomy: 1 pT1G1-2, 9 pT2G1-2, 3 pT3G2 (T
NM 1978); the remaining 6 were given palliative treatment. The 51 stag
e A1 patients were recalled for follow-up evaluation, only 20 came for
checking. They were reassessed by means of DRE, markers, prostate cyt
ologic aspiration, echo-guided transperineal needle biopsy and resecti
on of the prostatic cavity. Our experience seems to suggest that, if w
e define A1 as <3 G1 chips or less, this stage is to be considered an
incidental illness that seems not to require further treatment, but on
ly a policy of surveillance with yearly markers, DRE and echo-guided n
eedle biopsy.