Jl. Beaudeux et al., DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN LIPOPROTEIN(A) CONCENTRATIONS IN ICTERIC SERA MEASURED BY IMMUNONEPHELOMETRY AND ELECTROIMMUNODIFFUSION, Clinical biochemistry, 27(1), 1994, pp. 7-11
We compared the lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels in 32 icteric sera deter
mined both by an electroimmunodiffusion assay (EIA), using the Hydrage
l Lp(a) kit (Sebia, France) and by two immunonephelometric assays, one
on a Behring Nephelometer Analyzer (BNA), using antiserum from Immuno
france, and the other on a Beckman analyzer (Array), using antiserum f
rom Dako (Denmark). With the EIA assay, the Lp(a) level was 0.09 +/- 0
.09 (mean +/- SD in g/L), with the BNA assay, 1.01 +/- 1.51 and with t
he Array assay, 0.05 +/- 0.05. Sample blanks values (0.76 +/- 1.28 g/L
) demonstrated that the high Lp(a) levels obtained in the BNA assay ar
e caused by nonspecific precipitation. Analysis of the precipitate ind
icated the presence of Lipoprotein X, an abnormal lipoprotein that app
ears in the serum of patients with obstructive jaundice or with lecith
in-cholesterol acyltransferase deficiency. The precipitant seems to be
polyethyleneglycol (PEG) that was added to the reaction medium in bot
h the BNA and the Array assays to stabilize the Lp(a)-anti Lp(a) immun
e complex. In the Array assay, interference by this nonspecific precip
itation is eliminated by preliminary centrifugation of the diluted sam
ple. However, coprecipitation of Lp(a) could occur during this step. C
onsequently, the results of Lp(a) measurement in serum from patients w
ith hepatobiliary diseases should be interpreted with caution when imm
unonephelometric assays are used with a medium containing PEG.