Exon sizes in vertebrate genes are, with a few exceptions, limited to
less than 300 bases. It has been proposed that this limitation may der
ive from the exon definition model of splice site recognition. In this
model, a downstream donor site enhances splicing at the upstream acce
ptor site of the same exon. This enhancement may require contact betwe
en factors bound to each end of the exon; an exon size limitation woul
d promote such contact. To test the idea that proximity was required f
ar exon definition, we inserted random DNA. fragments from Escherichia
coli into a central exon in a three-exon dihydrofolate reductase mini
gene and tested whether the expanded exons were efficiently spliced. D
NA from a plasmid library of expanded minigenes was used to transfect
a CHO cell deletion mutant lacking the dhfr locus. PCR analysis of DNA
isolated from the pooled stable cotransfectant populations displayed
a range of DNA insert sizes from 50 to 1,500 nucleotides. A parallel a
nalysis of the RNA from this population by reverse transcription follo
wed by PCR showed a similar size distribution. Central exons as large
as 1,400 bases could be spliced into mRNA. We also tested individual p
lasmid clones containing exon inserts of defined sizes. The largest ex
on included in mRNA was 1,200 bases in length, well above the 300-base
limit implied by the sun-ey of naturally occurring exons. We conclude
that a limitation in exon size is not part of the exon definition mec
hanism.