In studies on hidden-covariation detection (HCD), it is demonstrated t
hat humans may be influenced by covariations between stimuli, without
acquiring any conscious or ''explicit'' knowledge about the crucial re
lations (e.g. Lewicki, Hill, & Sasaki, 1989). Even though not consider
ed to be of any consequence, in the majority of studies the crucial X-
Y covariation is embedded in a propositional structure of the type ''X
is a Y''. In the experiments reported here, however, the possibility
of HCD was studied in a situation implying mere spatio-temporal co-occ
urrence between two nonverbal stimuli X and Y Also, we investigated wh
ether high imagery ability facilitates performance on an evaluative HC
D task. While performing an attention-consuming distraction task, good
and poor imagers were first exposed to a covariation between the line
thickness (thick/thin) of a geometric figure and the valence (positiv
e/negative) of a subsequently presented slide. In the test phase, subj
ects were required to express their subjective evaluation of a series
of stimuli which differed in line thickness. In a series of three expe
riments, it was demonstrated that (a) even though none of the subjects
was evidenced to have acquired any explicit knowledge about the X-Y c
ovariation, (b) poor imagers' evaluations of the test stimuli were cle
arly influenced by the hidden acquisition covariation, whereas contrar
y to expectations, good imagers only evidenced a non-significant tende
ncy for HCD; (c) moreover, the HCD effect in poor imagers manifested i
tself in the form of an evaluative contrast, mirroring the acquisition
contingency. The data further suggested that (d) the evaluative contr
ast phenomenon is a performance rather than a learning issue. Finally,
it is argued that their may exist a fundamental conceptual similarity
between the HCD paradigm used in this study and the standard Pavlovia
n or Evaluative Conditioning paradigm.