Dm. Barrs et al., WORK-RELATED, NOISE-INDUCED HEARING-LOSS - EVALUATION INCLUDING EVOKED-POTENTIAL AUDIOMETRY, Otolaryngology and head and neck surgery, 110(2), 1994, pp. 177-184
This article reviews the evaluation of 246 workers (492 ears) who unde
rwent otologic and audiologic testing as part of a worker's compensati
on claim for-work-related; noise-induced hearing loss. Tinnitus was pr
esent in 58% of the patients, but was rarely a major symptom. Other ot
ologic symptoms or a history of ear disease were virtually nonexistent
. Standard audiometry showed a downsloping, high-frequency sensorineur
al hearing loss in 85% of the ears tested, with only 37% having a char
acteristic ''noise notch'' at 4000 or 6000 hertz. Asymmetric hearing l
oss was not uncommon, with 48 patients (20%) undergoing magnetic reson
ance scanning, all-of whom showed no central lesion responsible for th
e loss. Proven malingering was surprisingly uncommon (9%). In this stu
dy, evoked response audiometry was a valuable adjunct to confirm behav
ioral thresholds in the evaluation of possible work-related, noise-ind
uced hearing loss. The middle latency response was more effective than
the auditory brainstem response as a result of the high-frequency ste
epness of the audiometric curve.