Many potentially hazardous products are packaged in small containers.
Because of the limited amount of space available on these containers f
or warnings and other information, manufacturers often reduce the size
and amount of printed material on the labels. This frequently impairs
the message's legibility, noticeability and comprehensibility. Recent
ly, several alternative label designs have been investigated using pre
ference ratings, but whether the designs facilitate safer behaviour ha
s not been determined. In the present experiment, two alternative desi
gns (tag and wings) were compared with a conventional (control) design
for their effect on behavioural compliance with a warning on a very s
mall container of glue. Participants performed a parts-assembly task u
sing the glue without being informed of the study's real purpose. Whet
her participants wore protective gloves as directed by the warning was
measured. Results showed that the tag design produced significantly g
reater compliance than the other two designs. Measures of noticing, re
ading and recall of the warning mirrored the compliance results. While
participants generally preferred the control label, they most preferr
ed the tag warning. Overall, the results suggest that alternative desi
gns like the tag can enhance warning communication and compliance in c
ases where surface area is limited.