Atomistic modelling of metals using semi-empirical potentials has prov
ed to be a useful tool for the understanding of material properties. I
t is therefore important to collect information about the success and
limitations of potentials that are commonly used. A stringent test for
'glue' models of face-centred cubic metals is their prediction or oth
erwise of surface reconstructions. In this paper the stabilities of su
ch surface reconstructions for metals modelled by certain glue potenti
als are determined and the results compared with previous calculations
and experiment. Of the two types of model considered, one (due to Tos
atti and coworkers) is more successful at predicting contractive surfa
ce reconstructions and surface energies, while the other type (due to
Sutton and Chen) is found to be better at predicting microfaceting rec
onstructions and step roughening. The differences in behaviour between
the two types of model are discussed in terms of the details of the p
otentials.