A collaborative peer, self and tutor assessment scheme in which the st
udents themselves defined the marking schedule for a scientific report
of a laboratory experiment within the biological sciences, is evalute
d in terms of correlations between sets of marks. The issues addressed
in this report include: (1) the reliability of student-derived marks,
with particular emphasis on perceived tendencies of high achieving st
udents to underestimate their performance and low achieving students t
o overestimate their performance; (2) the use of student-derived marks
in formal grading procedures; and (3) the learning benefits which acc
rue for students participating in peer and self-assessment procedures.
The results of this study undertaken within the context of a clearly
defined, carefully monitored assignment indicate that students have a
realistic perception of their own abilities and can make rational judg
ements on the achievements of their peers. The positive implications o
f introducing peer and self-assessment schemes into undergraduate cour
ses are discussed.