Jc. Thurmon et al., HEMODYNAMIC AND ANALGESIC EFFECTS OF PROPOFOL INFUSION IN MEDETOMIDINE-PREMEDICATED DOGS, American journal of veterinary research, 55(3), 1994, pp. 363-367
Hemodynamic and analgesic effects of medetomidine (30 mu g/kg of body
weight, IM), atropine (0.044 mg/kg, IM), and propofol (2 mg/kg, IV, as
a bolus, and 165 mu g/kg/min, IV for 60 minutes, as an infusion) were
evaluated in 6 healthy adult Beagles. Catheters were placed while the
dogs were anesthetized with isoflurane in oxygen. Administration of i
soflurane was then discontinued, and dogs were allowed to breath oxyge
n until end-tidal isoflurane concentration was less than or equal to 0
.5%. At this time, baseline measurements were recorded and medetomidin
e and atropine a ere administered. Ten minutes later, the bolus of pro
pofol was given and the infusion was begun. Analgesia was evaluated wi
th a tail clamp test and by use of a direct-current nerve stimulator.
Sinoatrial and atrioventricular blockade developed in all 6 dogs withi
n 2 minutes of administration of medetomidine and atropine, but disapp
eared within 10 minutes. Apnea did not develop after administration of
propofol. Analgesia was strong and consistent throughout the entire 6
0-minute period of propofol infusion. Medetomidine significantly (P <
0.05) increased systemic vascular resistance and decreased cardiac out
put, compared with baseline values. Propofol infusion appeared to alle
viate medetomidine-induced vasoconstriction. Recovery was smooth and u
ncomplicated. Ah dogs were able to walk normally at a mean time (+/- S
EM) of 88.2 +/- 20.6 minutes after termination of propofol infusion. I
t was concluded that medetomidine, atropine, and propofol, as given in
the present study, is a safe combination of anesthetic drugs for use
in healthy Beagles.