Two patients with neck masses were evaluated, one with computed tomogr
aphy (CT) and the other with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Each mas
s was correctly identified within the carotid sheath. The correct diag
nosis-thrombosed cervical carotid aneurysm-was not considered, necessi
tating unexpected repair of the aneurysm or artery. Although rare, ane
urysm of the cervical carotid artery should be considered in the diffe
rential diagnosis of a carotid sheath mass between the jugular vein an
d carotid artery. Peripheral calcification or enhancement on CT scans
and a peripheral signal void on MR images are especially suggestive of
the diagnosis.