Tl. Fong et al., CLINICAL-SIGNIFICANCE OF CONCOMITANT HEPATITIS-C INFECTION IN PATIENTS WITH ALCOHOLIC LIVER-DISEASE, Hepatology, 19(3), 1994, pp. 554-557
The significance of antibodies to hepatitis C virus in patients with c
hronic alcoholic liver disease is unclear. Prior studies have utilized
the first-generation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, which is limi
ted by problems with sensitivity and specificity. Hepatitis C virus in
fection in 137 patients with biopsy-proven alcoholic liver disease was
assessed with second-generation hepatitis C virus antibody assays and
reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction for detection of hepa
titis C virus RNA in the serum. The patients were categorized into thr
ee groups according to results of serological testing. Discriminant-fu
nction analysis was used to determine which factors (risk, biochemical
and histological) could best differentiate the three groups. Thirty-t
hree patients were reactive on second-generation enzyme-linked immunos
orbent assay/second-generation recombinant immunoblot assay and RNA po
sitive (group 1). Twelve were reactive on second-generation enzyme-lin
ked immunosorbent assay/second-generation recombinant immunoblot assay
but RNA negative (group 2). Eighty-six were nonreactive on second-gen
eration enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and six were reactive on se
cond-generation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay but negative on seco
nd-generation recombinant immunoblot assay and negative for hepatitis
C virus RNA (group 3). Seventy-six percent of patients in group 1 and
58% in group 2 had parenteral risk factors, compared with only 1% in g
roup 3 (p < 0.00001). The mean ALT level was higher in group 1 patient
s (p < 0.05). The mean histologic activity index was significantly hig
her in group 1 (p = 0.0007). Periportal and bridging necrosis and port
al inflammation were significantly increased in group 1 (p = 0.0004 an
d p = 0.002, respectively). We found no significant difference in intr
alobular degeneration and focal necrosis or fibrosis among the three g
roups. The histological and biochemical features of groups 2 and 3 wer
e similar. Most patients with alcoholic liver disease with concomitant
hepatitis C infection have an identifiable parenteral risk factor. Pa
tients with viremia have histological evidence of chronic hepatitis su
perimposed on alcoholic liver disease. The histological features of he
patitis C virus antibody-reactive patients without viremia resemble th
ose of patients without serological evidence of hepatitis C virus infe
ction.