Historically, the Bible has occupied a prominent-though sometimes disr
uptive-position in American education. The 1963 Bible study benchmark
case, Abington v. Schempp (1963),:ruled that the Bible is worthy of st
udy, and that such study is constitutional. Both religious and educati
onal organizations support a literary study of the Bible in public sch
ools because it is great literature and because it is foundational for
understanding Western culture. The purpose of this study was : to det
ermine the current, actual place of Bible literature in high school En
glish classes and the reasons that affect its place. The study used qu
antitative and qualitative methods: survey, interviews, and observatio
ns.;lt included observations of three models of teaching Biblical lite
rature: a) a full-year elective course, b) a required grade 10 unit, a
nd c) a Bible unit ina humanities course. The study found that Bible l
iterature seems to play an extremely small role in high school literat
ure programs. While 81% of high school English teachers reported it wa
s important to teach some Bible literature, only 10% taught a Bible un
it or course; High school textbooks average one fourth of one percent
(.260%) from the Bible, Though 55% of college English instructors pers
onally recommended that secondary English majors take a Biblical liter
ature course, only 38% had done so. The wide gap between recommended s
tudy and actual study of the Bible is filled with misinformation, cont
radictory attitudes,and confusion. Two problems of teaching Bible lite
rature are: dealing with religious beliefs (and nonbeliefs) of teacher
s, parents, and students; and overcoming ignorance. Some college profe
ssors, administrators, English department, chairs, and librarians did
not ki;ow what Bible literature was; taught in their schools or that t
eaching Bible literature was legal.