I. Leblanc et al., ANORECTAL MANOMETRY AND ILEONAL ANASTOMOS IS - PREOPERATIVE AND POSTOPERATIVE MANOMETRIC COMPARISON, Annales de chirurgie, 48(2), 1994, pp. 183-187
The aim of this study was to evaluate the physiological and manometric
changes of anorectal function after proctocolectomy and ileal J pouch
anastomosis performed in 13 patients. A short muscular rectal cuff wa
s conserved in the first 5 patients, mucosectomy was performed in the
next patients (Group M), and the entire rectum and proximal portion of
the anal canal (1 mm aghove the dentate line) were resected without m
ucosectomy (Groupe WM) in the most recent patients. With a median post
operative follow-up of 18 months, anorectal continence was perfect in
9 patients, and minimal incontinence were observed in 4 patients (2 pa
tients in Group M, and 2 patients in Group SM). In Group M, the restin
g lower anal canal pressure was significantly decreased after the oper
ation and was less than the postoperative resting lower anal canal pre
ssure observed in Groupe SM. The resting upper anal canal pressure in
continent patients was inferior to the postoperative values measured i
n patients with minimal incontinence. In all the groups, no change in
squeeze pressure was observed after the operation. During the postoper
ative period, the rectoanal inhibitory reflex was absence in all patie
nts. The volume necessary for sensation threshold was increased after
the operation, in the same number of patients in Group M and SM, and m
ore frequently in continent patients compared with patients with soili
ng. The absence of muscular rectal cuff and mucosectomy seems to provi
de best results than rectal cuff preservation. After the operation, a
marked decrease in the resting pressure and an increase in the volume
necessary to onset of threshold sensation, were associated with the pr
esence of minimal incontinence.