D. Koutsomanis et al., PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF BIOFEEDBACK TREATMENT FOR PATIENTS WITH SLOW ANDNORMAL TRANSIT CONSTIPATION, European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology, 6(2), 1994, pp. 131-137
Objective: To assess biofeedback training as treatment in a consecutiv
e series of patients with idiopathic constipation. Design: Symptomatic
and physiological assessment before and after treatment. Methods: Ass
essment included a record of symptoms by diary card, measurement of wh
ole gut transit time, defecation proctography and anorectal function t
ests. During training sessions, muscular activity of the pelvic floor
was displayed to the patient as an electromyographic trace. The patien
t was taught to recognize resting electrical activity and the increase
associated with voluntary contraction of the pelvic floor. If there w
as an increase (rather than the normal decrease) in activity during de
fecation straining, the patient was encouraged to strain while maintai
ning relaxation of the anal sphincter muscles. Patients were assessed
at the end of treatment, after 6 weeks and after 6-12 months. Results:
Two types of pelvic incoordination were observed: an inability to rel
ax the pelvic floor on defecation straining and an inability to strain
effectively, both types improved with training. Of the 20 out of 30 u
nselected patients who completed training, there was significant impro
vement in bowel frequency, and a decrease in the number and duration o
f straining episodes at every follow-up period. Patients recorded sign
ificant overall perception of symptoms at each period; abdominal pain
and bloating improved at 6 weeks and 6-12 months. Conclusion: Approxim
ately 50% of the consecutive series of patients with constipation were
helped by two to six biofeedback training sessions. The improvement p
ersisted for at least 6-12 months.