The paper measures the cost of business cycles by asking what proporti
on of consumption representative households, whose head is currently e
mployed, would be prepared to give up to avoid the risk of unemploymen
t. Previous estimates by Lucas suggested that the costs of macroeconom
ic fluctuations measured in this way are surprisingly small. The first
part of the paper presents a critique of the Lucas aggregate method s
howing that his estimates are not robust. An alternative disaggregated
framework is then developed and shows that the costs of macroeconomic
fluctuations are significantly higher than those obtained by Lucas. C
onsequently, the view that inflation 'matters' whereas business cycles
are unimportant events is questioned.