Objective-To study the effect of sympathetic stimulation and increase
in heart rate on the QT and QTc intervals. Design-Prospective non-rand
omised study of eight consecutive patients. Setting-Electrophysiology
laboratory at a tertiary centre. Patients-Eight patients aged 10-20 ye
ars (median 12 . 5) undergoing repeat electrophysiological study after
previously successful catheter ablation (n = 6) or presumed supravent
ricular tachycardia (n = 2) with negative studies. Interventions-Elect
rocardiograms were obtained (a) at baseline, (b) during atrial pacing
at 450 ms cycle length, (c) during isoprenaline infusion at 0 . 05 mu
g/kg/min, (d) adding atrial pacing (450 ms cycle length) to isoprenali
ne at 0 . 025 mu g/kg/min, and (e) isoprenaline at 0 . 05 mu g/kg/min.
Main outcome measures-QT and QTc intervals at each of the above menti
oned stages. Results-The QT interval was reduced from a mean value of
350 ms to around 315-325 ms by each of the above manoeuvres. Correspon
dingly, the QTc increased from a mean of 407 ms to around 445-470 ms.
Pacing was as effective as isoprenaline in shortening the QT interval
and prolonging the QTc intervals. Conclusions-Heart rate directly infl
uences QT and QTc intervals in children and adolescents. The QT is sho
rtened, but QTc is prolonged. Hence, reliance on the QTc alone could l
ead to mistaken diagnosis of long QT syndrome.