Conventional vibro-acoustic stimulation tests require expensive vibro-
acoustic stimulators and electronic monitoring equipment. Attempts to
simplify the test have been made using an electric toothbrush and razo
r but even these simpler devices are not available in most primary car
e settings. We compared the sound pressure generated by a Corometrics
146 vibro-acoustic stimulator to that of an empty soft-drink can in an
in vitro study. The can compared favourably to the conventional vibro
acoustic stimulator.