The main points to note in terms of strategies in renal failure and th
e impact of lipids are: 1) Timing and typing of dyslipidemia; 2) Occur
rence of dyslipidemia in the course of strategies (conservative, dialy
sis and transplantation); 3) How the strategies can handle the impact
of lipids. Analysis of point 1 confirms what a complex profile uremic
dyslipidemia presents, involving the type, class, composition and enzy
me systems involved in lipid metabolism. In conservative and dialysis,
type IV (triglycerides) predominates; in transplantation, type II (ch
olesterol). Examination of point 2 shows the non obligatory relationsh
ip between dyslipidemia and the various strategies of treatment. Lipid
abnormalities type IV or II, occur in 50-60% of patients. Uremic fact
ors for dyslipidemia include: 1) enhanced hepatic stimulation or alter
ed removal in conservative strategies; 2) the same causes plus ''speci
fic'' promotors in dialysis (dialysis fluid, plasticizer leaching; bio
incompatibility, etc.); 3) steroid therapy and other ''accessories'' i
n transplantation. A genetic predisposition is very likely present in
all patients. Point 3, finally, analyzes the various ''supplements'' t
hat each strategy requires to cope with the lipid impact. Generic rule
s (ranging from doing nothing, to diet, drugs, etc.) are of value in a
ll strategies when dyslipidemia occurs. More specific rules include: a
) Conservative strategies: appropriate dietetic optimization and modul
ation (protein-lipid-carbohydrate ratio in terms of calories); b) Dial
ysis: timing treatment and improving biocompatibility; c) Transplantat
ion: reducing steroids as much as possible.