Gv. Nikiforovich et al., CONFORMATIONAL-ANALYSIS OF 2 CYCLIC ANALOGS OF ANGIOTENSIN - IMPLICATIONS FOR THE BIOLOGICALLY-ACTIVE CONFORMATION, Biochemistry, 33(12), 1994, pp. 3591-3598
Conformations of two cyclic analogs of angiotensin (Asp1-Arg2-Val3-Tyr
4-Val/Ile5-His6-Pro7-Phe8, AT), cyclo[Sar1, Cys3, Mpt5]-AT and cyclo[S
ar1, HCys3, Mpt5]-AT, were studied, independently employing two comple
mentary techniques, energy calculations and NMR measurements in DMSO s
olution. NMR data were indicative of well-defined solution conformatio
ns for the cyclic moieties of cyclo[Sar1, Cys3, Mpt5]-AT and cyclo[Sar
1, HCVS3, Mpt5]-AT, including the phi values for the Cys3/HCys3 and Ty
r4 residues, as well as the chi1 value for the Tyr4 residue. Solution
conformations for the exocyclic linear parts of both molecules cannot
be described by the NMR data with the same precision. At the same time
, independent energy calculations revealed the same conformations of c
yclic moieties of cyclo[Sar1, Cys3, Mpt5]-AT and cyclo[Sar1, HCys3, Mp
t5]-AT among low-energy conformers for both peptides. Moreover, the sa
me conformations are compatible with the model of AT receptor-bound co
nformation (Nikiforovich & Marshall, 1993), which assumes the particul
ar spatial arrangement of aromatic moieties of Tyr4, His6, and Phe8 re
sidues and the C-terminal carboxyl. These conformers of cyclo[Sar1, Cy
s3, Mpt5]-AT and cyclo[Sar1, HCys3, Mpt5]-AT contain ''an open turn''
in the backbone of the Tyr4-Val5 residues, instead of the earlier prop
osed beta-like reversal, thus confirming the suggestion that the confo
rmation(s) ensuring binding of AT analogs with specific receptors shou
ld not be described in terms of a unique backbone conformer.