CLINICAL AND LABORATORY COMPARISON STUDY OF REFRIGERATED AND CRYOPRESERVED BONE-MARROW FOR TRANSPLANTATION

Citation
Ra. Preti et al., CLINICAL AND LABORATORY COMPARISON STUDY OF REFRIGERATED AND CRYOPRESERVED BONE-MARROW FOR TRANSPLANTATION, Bone marrow transplantation, 13(3), 1994, pp. 253-260
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Hematology,Oncology,Immunology
Journal title
ISSN journal
02683369
Volume
13
Issue
3
Year of publication
1994
Pages
253 - 260
Database
ISI
SICI code
0268-3369(1994)13:3<253:CALCSO>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
Refrigerated storage for short-term preservation of bone marrow is an alternative to cryopreservation where chemotherapeutic regimens includ e drugs with short in vivo half-lives, We performed a clinical and lab oratory comparison of bone marrow stored at 4 degrees C for up to 9 da ys to bone marrow cryopreserved at -90 degrees C for autotransplantati on. After adjusting for the confounding effects of disease type or sex , no clinically meaningful variation in post-transplant course between refrigerated storage and cryopreserved was found. Therefore, the data presented in this study suggest that the clinical recovery indices fo llowing transplantation between the two storage groups are essentially equivalent. One potential advantage to refrigerated storage, however, is that it may provide an opportunity for extended exposure to growth factors and/or purging agents in vitro prior to transplantation. To p repare for an in vitro analysis of this hypothesis, we concentrated th e stem cell population and compared the nucleated cell recovery, viabi lity and colony forming potential following refrigerated storage of wh ole bone marrow and buffy coat to cryopreserved bone marrow stored for the same interval. While the nucleated cell recovery for cryopreserve d marrow was significantly greater than for refrigerated storage, the viability and colony forming potential of the refrigerated storage was superior or equivalent, independent of prior processing.