Dj. Miller et al., COMPARISON OF ACTIVITY LEVELS USING THE CALTRAC(R) ACCELEROMETER AND 5 QUESTIONNAIRES, Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 26(3), 1994, pp. 376-382
The purpose of this study was to compare the physical activity levels
of physical therapists using five activity questionnaires and one elec
tronic motion sensor (Caltrac(R)). Thirty-three physical therapists (2
6 female, seven male) were monitored for seven consecutive days. The C
altrac(R) data were compared with five questionnaires, including the B
aecke (Baecke); Godin and Shephard (Godin); Ross and Jackson (NASA); 3
-d record (3-d); and 7-d recall (7-d). A significant (P < 0.01) Spearm
an rank order correlation coefficient was observed between the Caltrac
(R) reading and the 7-d recall (r = 0.79). A significant correlation w
as also observed between the Caltrac(R) and the Godin (r = 0.45, P < 0
.01). Three of the questionnaires were also significantly (P < 0.01) c
orrelated with each other, including the NASA with the Baecke (r = 0.6
1). The 3-d record was not significantly correlated with any of the ot
her measures. The strong, significant correlation observed between the
Caltrac(R) data and the 7-d recall. The 7-d recall questionnaire woul
d be quicker, easier, and less expensive to use in a large population
study than the Caltrac(R)