Ys. Huang et al., DIFFERENCES IN THE METABOLISM OF 18 2N-6 AND 18/3N-6 BY THE LIVER ANDKIDNEY MAY EXPLAIN THE ANTIHYPERTENSIVE EFFECT OF 18/3N-6/, Biochemical medicine and metabolic biology, 51(1), 1994, pp. 27-34
The present study examined the in vitro and in vivo metabolism of 18:2
n-6 and 18:3n 6 by kidney and liver in the male adult spontaneously hy
pertensive (SHR) and normotensive (WKY) rats. In liver and kidney slic
es incubated for 1 h with either [1-C-14]18:2n-6 or [1-C-14]18:3n-6 (6
0 mu M), substantial amounts of radioactivity were incorporated into t
riacylglycerol and phospholipid fractions. Approximately 15% of the ra
diolabeled 18:2n 6 was converted into 18:3n-6 in liver slices but no c
onversion was found in kidney slices. When incubated with radiolabeled
18:3n-6, over 40% of the radioactivity was metabolized mainly to 20:4
n-6 in liver slices, but evenly to 20:3n-6 and 20:4n-6 in kidney slice
s. There were no differences between the results from SHR and those fr
om WKY. In WKY rats given an oral bolus of radiolabeled 18:3n-6, most
of the radioactivity was recovered in the liver and significantly less
in the kidney. In both tissues, the radioactivity was associated init
ially only with 18:3n 6 and later with its elongation product, 20:3n-6
. These findings indicated that the kidney, although unable to metabol
ize 18:2n 6, could metabolize 18:3n 6 taken up from the circulation. T
he effectiveness of 18:3n 6, compared to 18:2n-6, as an anti hypertens
ive agent may result from the provision of a post-Delta 6-desaturation
metabolite which can be directly converted to blood pressure-regulati
ng eicosanoids in the kidney. (C) 1994 Academic Press, Inc.